Methods
- The authors conducted two convenience sample studies:
- a counterbalanced within-subjects (i.e., all participants received both conditions) comparison of 31 adult smokers’ (12 male; 19 female) cravings following exposure to photographs (i.e., static cues) in which smoking is depicted and photographs in which smoking is not depicted;
- a randomized between-subjects (i.e., participants were randomly assigned to receive one condition or the other) comparison of 65 adult smokers’ (22 male; 43 female) cravings and smoking behavior following exposure to movie clips (i.e., dynamic cues) in which smoking was either depicted or not.
- For both studies, the authors assessed urges using a visual analogue scale (VAS).i
- For the static study, the authors also assessed urges using a 4-item Questionnaire of Smoking Urges (QSU; e.g., “I crave a cigarette.”).
- For the dynamic study, the authors also called participants one hour after the experiment and asked how many cigarettes they smoked during the previous hour.
- Table 1 shows that the static cue results indicated an effect of smoking cues on two measures of smoking urges, the QSU and the VAS: (1) QSU (t(30)=3.61, p<.01); and (2) VAS (t(30)=3.24 p<.01).
- The dynamic cue results indicated that, movie clip cues had no effect on cravings (F(1,61)=0.25, p>.05) or in the number of cigarettes smoked during the hour following the experiment (F(1,55)=0.12, p>.05), after adjusting for baseline smoking cravings.
Limitations
- Some aspects of the experimental design, including the small sample sizes and the university-based convenience samples, limit the generalizability of the study findings.
- The authors created the study cue materials from a single media source: the movie Atonement. The use of alternative and/or additional media sources could provoke different findings.
The results of this study were mixed (i.e., smoking cue effects influenced craving for static, but not dynamic cues). Other research suggests that smoking cues in movies have a variety of predictable effects on individuals’ smoking related behaviors and cognitions (see, A&H Vol. 3(2) for a discussion). Randomized experiments that utilize more representative and larger samples of participants will help elucidate the conditions under which smoking cues in movies affect viewers. Additional research also should pursue a direct comparison of the effects of static versus dynamic smoking cues. More generally, smoking in movies is an ongoing hot topic for public health advocates, movie viewers, and those in the movie industry, and remains worthy of additional research attention.
References
Lochbuehler, K. Engels, R. C. M. E., Scholte, R. H. J. (2009). Influence of smoking cues in movies on craving among smokers. Addiction, 104, 2102-2109.
iParticipants mark a line anchored by two descriptive words at the point that they feel represents their current state.

Comments