In one of Its last actlons before the month-long August recess, the United States Senate voted 90-10 to pass a bill prohibiting gambling on the Internet The leglslatlon, sponsored primanly by Jon Kyl (R-Arizona) is considered to be the most sweeping federal regulation of the Internet since the controverslai Communications Decency Act of 1996 (1) Two similar bills are currently maklng their way through the House of Representatives Bill H R 4350, introduced by Congressmen Stearns, Oxley, and Largent, iS similar in structure and content to the Senate version H.R. 2380, sponsored by Congressmen Goodlatte and Lobiondo is considerably different. A possible ban on Internet gambling has drawn together an unlikely coalition of backers. Heavy gambling states, New Jersey and Nevada support the ban, as do major league sports, Ralph Nader, the NCAA, and the ChristIan Coalition (2, 3). Such widespread support, however, is not a guarantee of promulgation It is possible that the final legislative product, if passed at all, will look significantly different than the one passed In the Senate. Several issues need to be considered. It is still unclear how such a ban will affect the sovereignty of Indian nations engaged in the gaming industry. Also, there will undoubtedly be issues of contested state and federal Jurisdiction And, of course, it remains to be seen whether such a prohibition can be effectively enforced. The tables below list some of the key points of the major bills.
1. Swartz. J ( 1998. July 24) Senate OKs gamblmg ban for Internet- LopsIded vote appks to offshore web sites San Franosco
2. Lelbowitz. W R. (1998. August 10) Senate bans most ‘net gambling. Many bet on poor enforcement. The National Law Journal, 86.
3. Chen. Edwn ( 1998. July 24) Internet gaming ban clears senate with ease. The Los Angeles Times A24