« STASH, Vol. 6(3) - Skittish rats: Anxiety behavior during early withdrawal from cocaine exposure | Main | The DRAM, Vol. 6(3) – Pass or fail? College students, binge drinking and academic performance. »

Wednesday, April 07, 2010

Comments

This is a very superficial study. If PGs on EGMs lost $1/hr of play it is obvious that the economic cost would be trivial. yes they would play more and me more noticable as well. Asking addicts if cutting their buzz would affect them would always result in them thinking they would find a way to
gamble. The facts are that EGMs are the main source of PG and they are controlled by governments
(not home brewed like alcohol) and the loss rates are set by legislation. Casinos are state sanctioned heroin shoot up galleries. reducing the supply of the drug must reduce EGM addiction.
Whether this rebounds in other forms no one really knows and asking addicts is not inherently reliable.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

The BASIS is a product of the Division on Addiction, Cambridge Health Alliance, a Harvard Medical School teaching hospital. The Division is an entirely self-funded academic organization that relies on grants, contracts, and gifts in order to produce The BASIS and our other high-quality work.
Donate5
Subscribe9