« Op-Ed/Editorials: Celebrating 20 Years with Monthly Giveaways - April | Main | The DRAM, Vol. 8(4) - Glass half empty or half full? Internalizing and externalizing pathways to risky alcohol use in DUI offenders »

Wednesday, April 11, 2012

Comments

Dear Heather,

Interesting research and findings.

I am curious to know the frequency of the pop-up messages, and whether the number of times the subject saw a message had any correlation to the number of bets they made or to the amount of money bet?

I am aware of research conducted in Australia looking at whether pop-up messages appearing during forced breaks in play influences gambling behaviour.

The study by Monaghan & Blaszczynski, (2009) examined the most effective message
content in addition to evaluating the mode of display of warning messages. They found that messages aimed at reducing irrational beliefs about gambling were shown to be
significantly less effective than messages encouraging players to reflect on their own behaviour. (e.g. Do you know how long you have been playing? Do you need to take a break?). Self‐appraisal messages had a significantly greater impact on gambling behaviours during sessions of play and in subsequent sessions of play in the two weeks after the experimental session.

References.

Monaghan, S. (2008). Review of Pop‐Up Messages on Electronic Gaming Machines as a Proposed Responsible Gambling Strategy. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 6, 214‐222. DOI 10.1007/s11469‐007‐9133‐1

Monaghan, S. (2009) Responsible gambling strategies for Internet gambling: The theoretical and empirical base of using pop‐up messages to encourage self‐awareness. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 202‐207. DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.008

Monaghan, S. & Blaszczynski, A. (2009). Impact of mode of display and message content of responsible gambling signs for electronic gaming machines on regular gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies. DOI 10.1007/s10899‐009‐9150‐z

Monaghan, S. & Blaszczynski, A. (2010). Electronic Gaming Machine Warning Messages: Informative versus self‐evaluation. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary & Applied, 144(1), 83‐96. DOI: 10.1080/00223980903356081

Regards,

Sue

Thanks for your interest in this post, Sue.

According to the paper, participants saw a total of eight pop-up messages: one message after each of the first 8 blocks, with each block consisting of 5 gambling trials. Participants saw no messages during the final block, which consisted of an endless number of all-losing trials. I’m guessing that because everyone in the message conditions saw the same number of messages, it didn’t make sense to examine the correlation between the number of messages and betting behavior.

And thanks for providing this additional information about the effects of different types of messages. In this current study, the authors only used messages aimed at changing irrational beliefs. It would be interesting to use the same Lucky Wheel paradigm with excessive gamblers and compare the effects of these two types of messages.

Are there any more studies that will be done on pathological gamblers?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

The BASIS is a product of the Division on Addiction, Cambridge Health Alliance, a Harvard Medical School teaching hospital. The Division is an entirely self-funded academic organization that relies on grants, contracts, and gifts in order to produce The BASIS and our other high-quality work.
Donate5
Subscribe9